| Jul 23, 2012 |
| Williams Partners Reaffirms Distribution-Growth Guidance Despite Lower Commodity Margins and Earnings Guidance |
- Maintaining Guidance for Strong Annual Distribution Growth - Up 8%
in 2012 and 9% at Midpoint in Each 2013 and 2014 on Strength of
Fundamental Business and Continued Growth
- Holding Firm on 2014 Guidance Midpoints of $2.3 Billion for
Distributable Cash Flow
- For Full-Year 2012, Lowering Guidance Midpoint to $1.6 Billion for
Distributable Cash Flow; Lowering DCF Guidance Midpoint to $1.9
Billion for 2013
- Lowering Estimate for 2Q 2012 Distributable Cash Flow to
Approximately $289 Million, Down From $475 Million in 1Q 2012 and $397
Million in 2Q 2011
- 2013 and 2014 Guidance Reflects Growing Fee-Based Business, More
Normal Maintenance Capital Spending, Benefit of Projects Coming Into
Service and NGL Margins Similar to Expected Full-Year 2012 Level
- Expecting Midpoints of Distribution-Coverage Ratio to Be 1.00 in
2012; 1.03 in 2013; 1.05 in 2014
- Key Driver Is Sharply Lower Near-Term NGL Prices Resulting From
Record Warm Winter, Low Ethylene Cracker Utilization, Growing
Supplies, Other Factors
- Pursuing Agreement to Acquire Williams' 83.3% Interest in Geismar
Olefins-Production Facility; Expect Acquisition Would Be Accretive and
Shift Ethane Price Exposure to Ethylene
- Developing Attractive Growth Projects to Meet Growing
Infrastructure Demand
Williams Partners (NYSE: WPZ) today reaffirmed its previously published
outlook through 2014 for strong growth in the cash distributions it pays
to unitholders, despite lowering its earnings outlook for the same
period to reflect less-favorable commodity prices.
The partnership continues to expect to pay unitholders a full-year 2012
distribution of $3.14 per unit, an 8 percent increase over 2011. As
well, the partnership confirmed it expects the midpoint of guidance for
the full-year distribution it pays unitholders in each 2013 and 2014 to
increase by 9 percent – to $3.43 and $3.75, respectively.
Williams Partners expects its second-quarter distributable cash flow
will be significantly lower than the first-quarter's results primarily
because of an unexpectedly sharp decline in natural-gas-liquids margins
in May and June. Additional factors in the change include normal
seasonal increases in maintenance capital expenditures; higher expenses
at Midstream because of maintenance accelerated during a third-party
fractionator outage; somewhat lower-than-expected volumes because of
construction timing; costs associated with recent acquisitions; and
normal seasonal demand changes and maintenance at Gas Pipeline. Higher
fee-based revenues partially offset these factors.
The partnership estimates its second-quarter distributable cash flow
will be approximately $289 million, down from $475 million in the first
quarter this year. The partnership's estimates of its second-quarter
results are preliminary and subject to change based on completion of its
normal quarter-end review process. As previously announced, the
partnership plans to report its finalized second-quarter financial
results on Aug. 1.
Williams Partners' revised guidance midpoints for full-year
distributable cash flow are $1.6 billion for 2012; $1.9 billion for
2013; and $2.3 billion for 2014. The partnership's 2012 DCF guidance
reflects the effect of significantly lower than expected NGL prices and
higher than normal maintenance capital expenditures. The partnership's
projected 2014 distributable cash flow is 37 percent higher than its
2011 DCF of $1.7 billion.
Regarding commodity prices, the partnership referenced an
NGL-to-crude-oil price ratio that is approximately 40 percent below the
10-year average. Key factors in that weakness are high propane
inventories caused by the extremely warm winter and the effect of the
propane oversupply on ethane inventories and pricing.
The partnership continues to expect the influence of NGL prices on its
performance to diminish over the next few years as it transitions to a
business mix that is largely fee-based. The partnership's revised 2013
and 2014 performance expectations reflect that shift to greater
fee-based business; the benefit of projects coming into service; and
some improvement from current depressed NGL market prices as excess
inventories are brought into balance as a result of additions to North
American capacity for steam-cracking, propane dehydrogenation (PDH) and
exports, as well as more normal weather.
Williams Partners' assumptions for certain energy commodity prices for
2012 through 2014 and the corresponding guidance for the partnership's
earnings and capital expenditures are displayed in the following table:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | Commodity Price Assumptions and Average NGL Margins |
|
| 2012 |
|
| 2013 |
|
| 2014 |
| | As of July 23, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Low | Mid | High | Low | Mid | High | Low | Mid | High | |
Natural Gas ($/MMBtu):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
NYMEX
| |
$2.50
|
$2.50
|
$2.50
|
$2.75
|
$3.25
|
$3.75
|
$3.25
|
$3.75
|
$4.25
| |
Rockies
| |
$2.30
|
$2.30
|
$2.30
|
$2.50
|
$3.00
|
$3.50
|
$3.05
|
$3.55
|
$4.05
| |
San Juan
| |
$2.35
|
$2.35
|
$2.35
|
$2.60
|
$3.10
|
$3.60
|
$3.10
|
$3.60
|
$4.10
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Oil / NGL:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Crude Oil - WTI ($ per barrel)
| |
$85
|
$92.50
|
$100
|
$70
|
$85
|
$100
|
$70
|
$85
|
$100
| |
Crude to Gas Ratio
| |
34.0x
|
37.0x
|
40.0x
|
25.5x
|
26.1x
|
26.7x
|
21.5x
|
22.5x
|
23.5x
| |
NGL to Crude Oil Relationship (1)
| |
42%
|
41%
|
39%
|
54%
|
51%
|
49%
|
54%
|
51%
|
49%
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Average NGL Margins ($ per gallon)
| |
$0.65
|
$0.67
|
$0.68
|
$0.63
|
$0.70
|
$0.77
|
$0.56
|
$0.63
|
$0.71
| |
Composite Frac Spread ($ per gallon) (2)
| |
$0.65
|
$0.70
|
$0.74
|
$0.68
|
$0.77
|
$0.87
|
$0.63
|
$0.73
|
$0.83
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Williams Partners Guidance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Amounts are in millions except coverage ratio. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Low
|
Mid
|
High
|
Low
|
Mid
|
High
|
Low
|
Mid
|
High
| |
DCF attributable to partnership ops. (3)
| |
$1,475
|
$1,550
|
$1,625
|
$1,725
|
$1,900
|
$2,075
|
$2,080
|
$2,265
|
$2,450
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Cash Distribution (4)
| |
$1,537
|
$1,553
|
$1,569
|
$1,790
|
$1,849
|
$1,908
|
$2,071
|
$2,157
|
$2,242
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Cash Distribution Coverage Ratio (3)
| |
0.96x
|
1.00x
|
1.04x
|
0.96x
|
1.03x
|
1.09x
|
1.00x
|
1.05x
|
1.09x
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Adjusted Segment Profit (3):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gas Pipeline
| |
$680
|
$700
|
$720
|
$700
|
$725
|
$750
|
$775
|
$800
|
$825
| |
Midstream
| |
950
|
1,025
|
1,100
|
1,100
|
1,275
|
1,450
|
1,350
|
1,550
|
1,750
| |
Total Adjusted Segment Profit
| |
$1,630
|
$1,725
|
$1,820
|
$1,800
|
$2,000
|
$2,200
|
$2,125
|
$2,350
|
$2,575
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Adjusted Segment Profit + DD&A:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Gas Pipeline
| |
$1,040
|
$1,070
|
$1,100
|
$1,070
|
$1,105
|
$1,140
|
$1,165
|
$1,200
|
$1,235
| |
Midstream
| |
1,315
|
1,400
|
1,485
|
1,520
|
1,705
|
1,890
|
1,820
|
2,030
|
2,240
| |
Total Adjusted Segment Profit + DD&A
| |
$2,355
|
$2,470
|
$2,585
|
$2,590
|
$2,810
|
$3,030
|
$2,985
|
$3,230
|
$3,475
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Capital Expenditures:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Maintenance
| |
$405
|
$440
|
$475
|
$350
|
$385
|
$420
|
$350
|
$385
|
$420
| |
Growth
| |
5,330
|
5,445
|
5,560
|
2,100
|
2,265
|
2,430
|
1,250
|
1,415
|
1,580
| |
Total Capital Expenditures
| |
$5,735
|
$5,885
|
$6,035
|
$2,450
|
$2,650
|
$2,850
|
$1,600
|
$1,800
|
$2,000
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | (1) This is calculated as the price of natural gas liquids as a
percentage of the price of crude oil on an equal volume basis. | | (2) Composite frac spread is based on Henry Hub natural gas and
Mont Belvieu NGLs. | | (3) Distributable Cash Flow, Cash Distribution Coverage Ratio and
Adjusted Segment Profit are non-GAAP measures. Reconciliations to
the most relevant measures included in GAAP are attached to this
news release. | | (4) The cash distributions in guidance are on an accrual basis
and reflect an approximate 8% (low), 9% (midpoint), and 10% (high)
increase in quarterly limited partner cash distributions annually
through 2014. | |
|
The increases Williams Partners expects to make in its cash
distributions are subject to quarterly approval by the board of
directors of the partnership's general partner.
In other news today, Williams Partners and Williams issued a news
release announcing they are pursuing an agreement for the partnership to
acquire Williams' 83.3 percent interest and operatorship of the
olefins-production facility in Geismar, La.
The partnership expects that the addition of olefins production to its
business via this acquisition would create significant additional
income, reduce the partnership's exposure to ethane margins and be
accretive to distributable cash flow, on a per-unit basis for the
partnership's unitholders.
As contemplated, Williams Partners would fund the transaction largely
with the issuance of limited-partner units to Williams.
The transaction is subject to execution of an agreement between the two
parties, review and recommendation by the conflicts committee of the
general partner of Williams Partners, and approval of the two parties'
boards of directors. As a result, the benefits of this planned
transaction are not included in current guidance.
Non-GAAP Measures
This press release includes certain financial measures - Distributable
Cash Flow, Cash Distribution Coverage Ratio, and Adjusted Segment Profit
- that are non-GAAP financial measures as defined under the rules of the
SEC.
For Williams Partners L.P., Adjusted Segment Profit excludes items of
income or loss that we characterize as unrepresentative of our ongoing
operations. Management believes Adjusted Segment Profit provides
investors meaningful insight into Williams Partners L.P.'s results from
ongoing operations.
For Williams Partners L.P. we define Distributable Cash Flow as net
income plus depreciation and amortization and cash distributions from
our equity investments less our earnings from our equity investments,
distributions to noncontrolling interests and maintenance capital
expenditures. We also adjust for payments and/or reimbursements under
omnibus agreements with Williams and certain other items.
For Williams Partners L.P. we also calculate the ratio of Distributable
Cash Flow to the total cash distributed (Cash Distribution Coverage
Ratio). This measure reflects the amount of Distributable Cash Flow
relative to our cash distribution. We have also provided this ratio
calculated using the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income.
This press release is accompanied by a reconciliation of these non-GAAP
financial measures to their nearest GAAP financial measures. Management
uses these financial measures because they are accepted financial
indicators used by investors to compare company performance. In
addition, management believes that these measures provide investors an
enhanced perspective of the operating performance of the Partnership's
assets and the cash that the business is generating. Neither Adjusted
Segment Profit nor Distributable Cash Flow are intended to represent
cash flows for the period, nor are they presented as an alternative to
net income or cash flow from operations. They should not be considered
in isolation or as substitutes for a measure of performance prepared in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
About Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ)
Williams Partners L.P. is a leading diversified master limited
partnership focused on natural gas transportation; gathering, treating,
and processing; storage; natural gas liquid (NGL) fractionation; and oil
transportation. The partnership owns interests in three major interstate
natural gas pipelines that, combined, deliver 14 percent of the natural
gas consumed in the United States. The partnership's gathering and
processing assets include large-scale operations in the U.S. Rocky
Mountains and both onshore and offshore along the Gulf of Mexico. Williams
(NYSE: WMB) owns approximately 68 percent of Williams Partners,
including the general-partner interest. More information is available at www.williamslp.com.
Williams Partners L.P. is a limited partnership formed by The
Williams Companies, Inc. (Williams). Our reports, filings, and other
public announcements may contain or incorporate by reference statements
that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. Such
statements are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. You typically can
identify forward-looking statements by various forms of words such as
"anticipates," "believes," "seeks," "could," "may," "should,"
"continues," "estimates," "expects," "forecasts," "intends," "might,"
"goals," "objectives," "targets," "planned," "potential," "projects,"
"scheduled," "will," or other similar expressions. These forward-looking
statements are based on management's beliefs and assumptions and on
information currently available to management and include, among others,
statements regarding: - Amounts and nature of future capital expenditures;
- Expansion and growth of our business and operations;
- Financial condition and liquidity;
- Business strategy;
- Cash flow from operations or results of operations;
- The levels of cash distributions to unitholders;
- Seasonality of certain business components; and
- Natural gas, natural gas liquids, and crude oil prices and demand.
Forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions,
uncertainties and risks that could cause future events or results to be
materially different from those stated or implied in this announcement.
Many of the factors that will determine these results are beyond our
ability to control or predict. Specific factors that could cause actual
results to differ from results contemplated by the forward-looking
statements include, among others, the following: - Whether we have sufficient cash from operations to enable us to pay
current and expected levels of cash distributions following
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including payments to our general partner;
- Availability of supplies, market demand, volatility of prices, and
the availability and cost of capital;
- Inflation, interest rates and general economic conditions
(including future disruptions and volatility in the global credit
markets and the impact of these events on our customers and suppliers);
- The strength and financial resources of our competitors;
- Ability to acquire new businesses and assets and integrate those
operations and assets into our existing businesses, as well as expand
our facilities;
- Development of alternative energy sources;
- The impact of operational and development hazards;
- Costs of, changes in, or the results of laws, government
regulations (including safety and climate change regulation and
changes in natural gas production from exploration and production
areas that we serve), environmental liabilities, litigation and rate
proceedings;
- Our allocated costs for defined benefit pension plans and other
postretirement benefit plans sponsored by our affiliates;
- Changes in maintenance and construction costs;
- Changes in the current geopolitical situation;
- Our exposure to the credit risk of our customers and counterparties;
- Risks related to strategy and financing, including restrictions
stemming from our debt agreements, future changes in our credit
ratings and the availability and cost of credit;
- Risks associated with future weather conditions;
- Acts of terrorism, including cybersecurity threats and related
disruptions; and
- Additional risks described in our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC).
Given the uncertainties and risk factors that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statement, we caution investors not to unduly rely on our
forward-looking statements. We disclaim any obligations to and do not
intend to update the above list or to announce publicly the result of
any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements to reflect future
events or developments. In addition to causing our actual results to differ, the factors
listed above may cause our intentions to change from those statements of
intention set forth in this announcement. Such changes in our intentions
may also cause our results to differ. We may change our intentions, at
any time and without notice, based upon changes in such factors, our
assumptions, or otherwise. Limited partner interests are inherently different from the capital
stock of a corporation, although many of the business risks to which we
are subject are similar to those that would be faced by a corporation
engaged in a similar business. Investors are urged to closely consider
the disclosures and risk factors in our annual report on Form 10-K filed
with the SEC on February 28, 2012, and our quarterly reports on Form
10-Q available from our offices or from our website. |
| | Reconciliation of Non-GAAP "Distributable Cash Flow" to GAAP "Net
income" | |
|
| |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | 2011 | | 2012 | | (Dollars in millions, except coverage ratios) |
| 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr | 3rd Qtr | 4th Qtr | Year | | 1st Qtr | 2nd Qtr* | Year* | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Williams Partners L.P. | | | | | | | | | | | | Reconciliation of Non-GAAP "Distributable Cash Flow" to GAAP "Net
income" | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Net income
| |
$
|
307
| |
$
|
338
| |
$
|
342
| |
$
|
391
| |
$
|
1,378
| | |
$
|
348
| |
$
|
193
| |
$
|
541
| | |
Depreciation and amortization
| | |
150
| | |
154
| | |
155
| | |
152
| | |
611
| | | |
156
| | |
167
| | |
323
| | |
Non-cash amortization of debt issuance costs included in interest
expense
| | |
5
| | |
5
| | |
3
| | |
4
| | |
17
| | | |
4
| | |
3
| | |
7
| | |
Equity earnings from investments
| | |
(25
|
)
| |
(36
|
)
| |
(40
|
)
| |
(41
|
)
| |
(142
|
)
| | |
(30
|
)
| |
(27
|
)
| |
(57
|
)
| |
Gain on sale of assets
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | | |
-
| | |
(6
|
)
| |
(6
|
)
| |
Acquisition-related costs
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | | |
-
| | |
15
| | |
15
| | |
Allocated reorganization-related costs
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | | |
-
| | |
7
| | |
7
| | |
Net reimbursements (payments) from/(to) Williams under omnibus
agreements
| | |
8
| | |
2
| | |
6
| | |
15
| | |
31
| | | |
6
| | |
1
| | |
7
| | |
Maintenance capital expenditures
| |
|
(34
|
)
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
(126
|
)
|
|
(414
|
)
| |
|
(61
|
)
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
(171
|
)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Distributable Cash Flow excluding equity investments
| | |
411
| | |
357
| | |
318
| | |
395
| | |
1,481
| | | |
423
| | |
243
| | |
666
| | |
Plus: Equity investments cash distributions to Williams Partners L.P.
| |
|
30
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
169
|
| |
|
52
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
98
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Distributable Cash Flow
| |
$
|
441
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
$
|
444
|
|
$
|
1,650
|
| |
$
|
475
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
$
|
764
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Total cash distributed:
| |
$
|
276
| |
$
|
286
| |
$
|
294
| |
$
|
311
| |
$
|
1,167
| | |
$
|
363
| |
$
|
373
| |
$
|
736
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Coverage ratios: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Distributable Cash Flow divided by Total cash distributed
| |
|
1.60
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
1.43
|
|
|
1.41
|
| |
|
1.31
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
1.04
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Net income divided by Total cash distributed
| |
|
1.11
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
1.18
|
| |
|
0.96
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
0.74
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
* The estimates of second quarter results are preliminary and
subject to change based on completion of the company's normal
quarter-end review process. As previously announced, the company
plans to report its final second-quarter financial results on
August 1, 2012.
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | Segment profit guidance – reported to adjusted | |
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| | | Dollars in millions | | 2012 Guidance | | | 2013 Guidance | | | 2014 Guidance | | |
Low
| |
Midpoint
| |
High
| | |
Low
| |
Midpoint
| |
High
| | |
Low
| |
Midpoint
| |
High
| | Reported segment profit: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Midstream
| |
$
|
932
| | |
$
|
1,007
| | |
$
|
1,082
| | | |
$
|
1,100
| |
$
|
1,275
| |
$
|
1,450
| | |
$
|
1,350
| |
$
|
1,550
| |
$
|
1,750
| |
Gas Pipeline
| |
|
679
|
| |
|
699
|
| |
|
719
|
| | |
|
700
| |
|
725
| |
|
750
| | |
|
775
| |
|
800
| |
|
825
| |
Total reported segment profit
| | |
1,611
| | | |
1,706
| | | |
1,801
| | | | |
1,800
| | |
2,000
| | |
2,200
| | | |
2,125
| | |
2,350
| | |
2,575
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Adjustments: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Acquisition-related costs
| | |
24
| | | |
24
| | | |
24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gain on sale of certain assets
| |
|
(6
|
)
| |
|
(6
|
)
| |
|
(6
|
)
| | |
|
-
| |
|
-
| |
|
-
| | |
|
-
| |
|
-
| |
|
-
| |
Total adjustments - Midstream
| | |
18
| | | |
18
| | | |
18
| | | | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Loss related to Eminence storage facility leak
| |
|
1
|
| |
|
1
|
| |
|
1
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total adjustments - Gas Pipeline
| | |
1
| | | |
1
| | | |
1
| | | | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
Total segment profit adjustments
| | |
19
| | | |
19
| | | |
19
| | | | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | | |
-
| | |
-
| | |
-
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Adjusted segment profit: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Midstream
| | |
950
| | | |
1,025
| | | |
1,100
| | | | |
1,100
| | |
1,275
| | |
1,450
| | | |
1,350
| | |
1,550
| | |
1,750
| |
Gas Pipeline
| |
|
680
|
| |
|
700
|
| |
|
720
|
| | |
|
700
| |
|
725
| |
|
750
| | |
|
775
| |
|
800
| |
|
825
| |
Total adjusted segment profit
| |
$
|
1,630
| | |
$
|
1,725
| | |
$
|
1,820
| | | |
$
|
1,800
| |
$
|
2,000
| |
$
|
2,200
| | |
$
|
2,125
| |
$
|
2,350
| |
$
|
2,575
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Net income & distributable cash flow | |
| |
|
| |
|
| | | Dollars in millions | | 2012 Guidance | | | 2013 Guidance | | | 2014 Guidance | | |
Low
|
|
Midpoint
|
|
High
| | |
Low
|
|
Midpoint
|
|
High
| | |
Low
|
|
Midpoint
|
|
High
| |
Net income
| |
$
|
1,060
| | |
$
|
1,150
| | |
$
|
1,240
| | | |
$
|
1,230
| | |
$
|
1,420
| | |
$
|
1,610
| | | |
$
|
1,500
| | |
$
|
1,700
| | |
$
|
1,900
| | |
Depreciation and amortization
| | |
725
| | | |
745
| | | |
765
| | | | |
790
| | | |
810
| | | |
830
| | | | |
860
| | | |
880
| | | |
900
| | |
Maintenance capital expenditures
| | |
(405
|
)
| | |
(440
|
)
| | |
(475
|
)
| | | |
(350
|
)
| | |
(385
|
)
| | |
(420
|
)
| | | |
(350
|
)
| | |
(385
|
)
| | |
(420
|
)
| |
Gain on sale of assets
| | |
(6
|
)
| | |
(6
|
)
| | |
(6
|
)
| | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | |
Acquisition-related costs
| | |
24
| | | |
24
| | | |
24
| | | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | |
Allocated reorganization-related costs
| | |
7
| | | |
7
| | | |
7
| | | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | | |
-
| | |
Other / Rounding
| |
|
70
|
| |
|
70
|
| |
|
70
|
| | |
|
55
|
| |
|
55
|
| |
|
55
|
| | |
|
70
|
| |
|
70
|
| |
|
70
|
| |
Distributable Cash Flow
| |
$
|
1,475
| | |
$
|
1,550
| | |
$
|
1,625
| | | |
$
|
1,725
| | |
$
|
1,900
| | |
$
|
2,075
| | | |
$
|
2,080
| | |
$
|
2,265
| | |
$
|
2,450
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Cash Distributions 1 | |
$
|
1,537
| | |
$
|
1,553
| | |
$
|
1,569
| | | |
$
|
1,790
| | |
$
|
1,849
| | |
$
|
1,908
| | | |
$
|
2,071
| | |
$
|
2,157
| | |
$
|
2,242
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Cash Distribution Coverage Ratio
| |
0.96x
| |
1.00x
| |
1.04x
| | |
0.96x
| |
1.03x
| |
1.09x
| | |
1.00x
| |
1.05x
| |
1.09x
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Net Income / Cash Distributions
| |
0.69x
| |
0.74x
| |
0.79x
| | |
0.69x
| |
0.77x
| |
0.84x
| | |
0.72x
| |
0.79x
| |
0.85x
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1 Distributions in 2012 reflect quarterly increases of
1.0¢ in the low case, 1.5¢ in the midpoint case and 2.0¢ in the high
case over the 1Q 2012 distribution of $0.7775. In 2013-2014
distributions reflect quarterly increases of 1.5¢ in the low case,
2.0¢ in the midpoint case, and 2.5¢ in the high case. Distributions
are paid in the quarter following the period in which they are
earned.
| |
|

Williams Partners Media Relations: Jeff Pounds, 918-573-3332 or Investor
Relations: John Porter, 918-573-0797 or Sharna Reingold,
918-573-2078
|
|